I've moved my blog to patrosierblog.wordpress.com and reactivated it over there.
http://patrosierblog.worpress.com
http://patrosierblog.worpress.com
reading and writing
I wrote in
an earlier post about Vladimir Nabokov’s tragic/ comic Pnin. His Pale Fire is
tricksier, just as hilarious in places, and compelling, but there is no
character to equal Professor Pnin. The protagonist, KInbote, is the most
unreliable of narrators. Most of the novel takes place as his deluded commentary
on the poem Pale Fire by murdered poet John Shade, footnotes included. Having
read these two books I don’t understand why Nabokov’s fame rests on Lolita; it’s not nearly as good as
either of these. Pale Fire has been
described somewhere as a precursor to David Foster Wallace’s  Infinite
Jest. Apart from the footnotes, I don’t see it.
New Zealand
poet Glenn Colquhoun has published a collection of prose writings plus some
poems, Jumping Ship and Other Essays. He
gets a lot right. Take this:
I just read
an article in the New Yorker (15
March 2013) by Susan Faludi, about
Shulamith Firestone. I knew Firestone had died last year, sick and poor, but I
didn’t know the extent of the tragedy that was her life. (I doubt she would
like being included in a post mainly about men.) She was an icon, a firebrand,
a passionate, uncompromising fighter, the author of The Dialectics of Sex, a radical feminist  theory of politics where she argued that
gender inequality was the result of a patriarchy that structured society by defining
women through their biology. For her the biological family was a tyranny
imposed on women. I remember being shocked by her ideas at the same time as
admiring her for putting them out there. She was an icon, an example of a
fearlessness that many of us lacked. Is it foolish, I wonder, to wish she had
had a better subsequent life?
One of the highlights of a recent trip to
Auckland was the launch of Aorewa McLeod's new novel Who Was That Woman Anyway? Snapshots
of a lesbian life. The crowd in The Women’s Bookshop spilled out into the
street as Stella Duffy did the honours and Aorewa talked about the writing of
the book and read two extracts. 
When I
started reading Rose Tremaine’s Merivel, I
thought it might be a variation on Hilary Mantel’s magnificent Wolf Hall and Bring Up the Bodies. It isn’t. Merivel the character is not a
political figure, he’s much more Montaigne—to whom he refers often—than Thomas
Cromwell. He wants to believe in himself as worthwhile but struggles with his
own past and present dissipations and can’t decide whether he is slave or
friend to Charles II. As a physician of his time, he pays plenty of attention
to bodily functions, smells and (lack of) sanitation. In many ways a foolish
character given to weeping, he survives many changes of fortune.